Whatever standard of review is applied, the courts must balance competing concerns. Supreme Court decisions involving news racks For non-public forums, the restrictions on speech must be reasonable and not discriminate on the basis of viewpoint. If the location is a non-public forum, then the judicial review is less stringent.
If someone engages in free expression - say, by erecting a sign, giving a speech or installing a news rack - at a location considered to be a traditional or limited public forum, a judge or court will closely scrutinize any effort to restrict that expression. In First Amendment law, the public-forum doctrine provides different levels of protection against restrictions of expression on public property, depending on the nature of the property. For instance, publishers and city officials will often clash over news racks not only on sidewalks or along public streets but also on various other kinds of city-owned property that are not public forums. Many times it becomes important to determine on what type of property a disputed news rack is located. Suffice it to say, news-rack disputes implicate many strands of First Amendment jurisprudence.
But some courts have determined that the regulation of news racks more directly involves commercial speech. Because noncommercial speech, such as political speech, receives greater protection under the First Amendment than commercial speech, publishers often argue that city regulations should be treated as restricting noncommercial speech. Newspaper publishers contend that news-rack regulations affect both noncommercial and commercial speech. Many times the disputes end up in federal court. Some cities have sought to prohibit individual, free-standing news racks and replace them with multi-rack units. They add that news racks can reduce pedestrian safety. Many people buy their newspapers through news racks.Ĭities counter that the regulation of news racks combats visual clutter. Publishers argue that news racks are an essential method of conveying important information to the public. The regulation of news racks presents an intriguing clash between newspaper publishers’ First Amendment rights and cities’ interests in aesthetics and safety. Alternatively, a streamlined metal magazine rack might be a better fit, texture-wise, if you’re looking for clean lines and an overall polished style to complement a minimalist approach.īrowse the selection of antique and vintage magazine racks and stands on 1stDibs to find the perfect accent piece for any space.By David L. Mid-century modern magazine racks are also versatile in that regard, with furniture designers at the time working in teak (a preferred material for makers of the period), bamboo and rattan and exploring different forms and provocative embellishments. Wood magazine racks, no matter the era of origin, are going to bring warmth to your entertainment room and will sit snugly alongside your organic modern furnishings. And given that so many have been made over the years, the right magazine rack to work cohesively in your space no matter your furniture style shouldn’t be hard to find. Adding a rack or stand to your home office or reading nook is going to help you keep your desk and coffee table tidy. This accessory will keep clutter to a minimum, and, best of all, it encourages visitors to read at their leisure. In your living room, a well-designed vintage magazine rack will help display your magazines in an orderly fashion while maintaining the stylistic integrity of your space. As the popularity of magazines and newspapers grew, so did the need to store and organize them. The first magazine in America was published in the 1700s.
Antique and vintage magazine racks and stands provide an easy organization option for storing your favorite periodicals without tucking them away out of sight.